https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362344336_A_structure_for_continuous_improvement_in_workforce_development_a_conference_paper
A structure for continuous
improvement in workforce development: a conference paper
The Spiral of Robust Education
Ellis 2022
This paper is being shared
altruistically as the concepts may be of value to others in the generation of their
organisational learning and development. It is a simple but robust concept that
has gained favour with external agencies such as the Care Quality Commission in
the United Kingdom and draws upon a minor element of my Doctoral research
(Ellis 2022). Many of the concepts are already well understood in the workforce
development sector and therefore I cannot see this as a “staggeringly” original
piece of work that on its own could be worthy of formal publication. However
for the many people who have asked me for a copy, here it is openly available
on ResearchGate.
Best wishes
Jon Ellis
The purpose of these standards is
to set out processes that are replicable across our courses from single
lectures to multifaceted workforce development programmes and gives us a
defensible position against inspection or legal challenge, protection of intellectual
property through uniform development and storage, as well as a commercially
saleable product. The process is a spiral and not a circle. A circle returns to
the beginning, a spiral builds on the previous experiences and progresses to a
vortex that draws in positive development of education and thus services.
Through this process we will demonstrably respond to the 4
Primary Curriculae and their sub-groups.
|
Planned Curriculum |
Explicit Curriculum |
Goals and Standards that follow
accepted syllabi and legislation |
|
Implicit (Hidden) Curriculum |
Demonstration through the
teacher as a role model of desirable and undesirable socialisation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delivered Curriculum |
Explicit Curriculum |
Goals and Standards that follow
accepted syllabi and legislation |
|
Implicit (Hidden) Curriculum |
Demonstration through the
teacher as a role model of desirable and undesirable socialisation |
|
|
Teacher’s experience of the
lesson |
What worked, what did not work
and options to evolve the lesson. Documented on the feedback form or by
direct email. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Experienced Curriculum |
Explicit Curriculum |
Goals and Standards that follow
accepted syllabi and legislation |
|
Implicit (Hidden) Curriculum |
Demonstration through the
teacher as a role model of desirable and undesirable socialisation |
|
|
Student’s experience of the
lesson |
What worked, what did not work
and options to evolve the lesson. Documented on the feedback form or by
direct email. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affirmed Curriculum |
Stakeholder Feedback, Clinical
Feedback, Class, and Teacher Feedback review, National and Local Standards
review, V-C 1080 Appendix 3 requests for educational content leading to
development of the lesson(s) |
Archive the old presentation Approve the new presentation |
The Key Elements are:
|
1. Scheme of Work 2. Presentation 3. Lesson Plans 4. Assessment 5. Qualified Practice |
|
The Planned Curriculum & The Delivered Curriculum |
|
6. Feedback |
|
The
Experienced Curriculum |
|
7. Review |
|
The Affirmed
Curriculum |
1)
The Scheme of Work
A Scheme of Work is more than just a syllabus but less
specific than a lesson plan. In essence a scheme of work is akin to a module or
course handbook in its scope. It can also function as a proposal or request for
an education intervention. A simple form to facilitate this and support the
education team in producing a formalised education package has been provided:
A Request for Educational Content (Appendix 1)
submission to the Head of Workforce Development or the Head of Safeguarding
will define:
i.
Who requires the intervention?
ii.
The urgency of the intervention.
iii.
The target groups.
iv.
The divisional preferences for delivery style.
v.
The desired learning outcomes and academic level*.
NB. No
one will be expected to complete this in isolation. It is fully expected that
completion of a Request for Educational Content will be best achieve in a
specific meeting between the Head of Workforce Development and/ or the Head of
Safeguarding and the Requesting Manager to achieve a thorough answer to the
questions and analysis on this form.
*Academic level – this
is unless stated otherwise, accepted as Level 7 as this reflects the
expected competency standards.
For Safeguarding this is unless stated otherwise, accepted
as Level 3 as this reflects the Statutory and Mandatory Framework.
Upon receipt of the completed form the relevant staff members will be
allocated the task of producing the education package.
2)
Approval of the presentation in the
format(s) requested is a 3-step process.
i.
Review of Draft in consultation with the Requesting
Manager, Author, and Head of Department (and other specialists as required).
ii.
Approval of Presentation, Lesson Plan and
Assessment Tool by Requesting Manager, Author, and Head of Department (and
other specialists as required).
iii.
Ratified at Workforce Development Group.
The presentation will be produced that reflects the:
Corporate Presentation Guidelines
Supported by the PowerPoint template as appropriate
A similar template and key element structure can be created for the
Access Learning Management System.
Each education package will have its own folder on a central secure Drive
under the Workforce Development Group containing the following sub-folders or
files:
i.
Archive of all previous version materials by
year
ii.
Current Presentation – version and date
iii.
Current Lesson Plan – version and date
iv.
Current Assessment Toll – version and date
v.
Supporting Materials
3)
Lesson Plans
A lesson plan
provides you with a general outline of your teaching goals, learning
objectives, and means to accomplish them, and is by no means exhaustive. A
productive lesson is not one in which everything goes exactly as planned, but
one in which both students and teacher learn from each other. A lesson plan is
an essential element of a robust teaching package as it seeks to ensure uniform
delivery of the intended “message” by all teachers involved in its rollout. A
common failing at all levels of education is a teacher that simply relies on
their presentation to guide the lesson because they wrote it, and they are the
only person who will teach it; unfortunately when someone else needs (due to
staff sickness for example) to teach the lesson the results will vary because
the key to the direction of the lesson is missing, and quality may be affected.
The lesson plan is a key element to the defence of an educational intervention
because it demonstrates planned, uniform delivery.
All educational
presentations will have a lesson plan.
There are 2
standardised Lesson Plan Templates (Face to Face and eLearning Lesson
Plans Appendix 2) both of which meet Ofsted and the Higher Education
Academy (HEA) standards which in turn are underpinned by the QAAHE standards.
eLearning
Lesson Plans – another common failing in education is the development of
asynchronous distance education, usually presented in the modern world, in an
electronic format where the developer fails to plan for sufficient support for
the student. Asynchronous education must include sufficient materials and
explanation to take the place of a direct narrative from the teacher. The
eLearning Lesson Plan will again demonstrate thorough planning and guide the
person writing the eLearning package to ensure this support is in place.
Objectives
and Sub-objectives (also known as Learning Outcomes)
These will be
written to the Performance, Condition and Criterion structure (Mager
1997) as taught on the Practice Educator (PEd) Course and described in detail
in the Developmental Action Plan Guide. This way there is little chance for
confusion in gauging attainment.
4)
Assessment
Tools
An Assessment Tool will accompany most educational
interventions, because simply attending a lecture is insufficient to prove
attainment of knowledge and skills. If we examine one of the simplest
definitions of teaching.
“Teaching is a planned experience that
brings about a change in behaviour.”
One might stand in front of the assembled class and
teach but teaching and learning are very different things. Just because a
teacher has imparted knowledge there is no guarantee that the class has learnt
this information, only by assessment do we establish that learning has taken
place, and only through repeated assessment can we establish retention of
knowledge.
The content of the assessment will very likely simply
reflect the content of the presentation, to help ensure quality assurance of
the teaching episode and in line with the Request for Educational Content
discussed earlier and because as an organisation we are focused on performance
management and achievement of the organisational goals. Our in-house education
interventions have little or no time for the joy of Liberal Education as
practiced in Higher Education in which assessment encompasses the results of
many hours of self-directed study. Although reflective activities and projects
are possible under certain circumstances.
The assessment tool chosen may be as simple as:
·
A question-and-answer session,
·
A discussion group, or
·
A Role-Play exercise.
But these
often suffer from the lack of a clear, individualised record.
More robust assessment tools might include:
·
Question papers – these will require review of
the presentation
·
Fill in the blanks – these will require
simultaneous reading of the original text to find the answer
· Multiple Choice – (any question to which the
answer is “all of the above” will be rejected).
·
True or False
·
Short Answer
The advantage
to these is that recording, archiving, and proving achievement are simple.
·
Online testing and marking are in development.
CPD
Certificates will be awarded upon successful completion as confirmed by the PEd
teaching the course by signing the confirmation of completion on the course
Register and returning the register and any assessment sheets to the Learning
and Organisational Development Manager and copied to the Head of Workforce
Development
5)
Practice Educators
A
Practice Educator (PEd) will need expertise in the subject area in order to
teach students, or the support of a subject expert during delivery of the
education package. Teaching methods include lectures, seminars, tutorials,
practical demonstrations, field work and e-learning.
The
Practice Educator course has been designed to an appropriate academic standard,
which will prepare PEds to support both qualified clinicians and university
students – appropriate to their own skill level. The course covers the 3
elements of Practice Education – Workplace training, Mentorship and
Preceptorship and Clinical Supervision. PEds will only teach short courses such
as Basic Life Support (for which they will receive specific additional training
and practical support) or facilitate secondary learning for students that have
already passed the theory/ pre-placement element of their university education i.e.
they are not expected or required to teach clinical knowledge and skills to
some who has not already had formal education on the subject.
Practice Educator Assessments
·
Complete PEd Development Part
1 (Monday to Wednesday)
·
Complete PEd Development Part
2 Train the Trainer – BLS (Thursday and Friday)
Then -
· 3 Completed (different people) assessment
activities.
The
course ensures that we can demonstrate that we have PEds that are trained to
deliver education and to make fair educational decisions when students are
under assessment.
Quality
Assurance of PEds
Each
PEd will have
i.
An annual peer-review
ii.
The Head of Workforce
Development will monitor feedback forms
6)
Feedback
Feedback forms have the space for both students and
PEds to comment on the lessons.
Electronic delivery formats – it is hoped that we will
eventually have an online education development tool which will in turn have an
online feedback form. Outside of this for example Zoom delivery, emails to the
PEd who delivered the lesson or to the Head of Workforce Development will also
be reviewed as part of the feedback system. Feedback forms can be sent out on
request.
7)
Review
Feedback forms will be monitored and thematically
analysed for trends from which modifications to packages can be facilitated in
agreement through the Approval Process described in Section 2.
The original author will annually review education
packages where available or a delegated reviewer with appropriate subject
knowledge. Updates against current standards will be made to:
·
A New Copy of the Presentation with New Version
Number and Date.
·
The old version will be archived
This way we
will be able to demonstrate what we currently teach against what was previously
taught to previous standards and thereby enabling defence of historic claims.
References
Ellis J (2022)
What are the lived experiences of Advanced Paramedic Practitioners working in
the emerging specialty of Integrated Urgent Care? Available at ResearchGate.net
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14458.57282
Mager, R.F.
(1997). Preparing instructional objectives. 3rd Ed. Atlanta. CEP Press
Slavin R
(2003) 7th Ed Educational Psychology Theory & Practice, Allyn, and Bacon
Wolf, A (1995)
Competence-based assessment. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Appendix 1
Request for Education Content
(please complete one form for each
education topic request)
|
Date of Request |
|
|
Name of Directorate |
|
|
Name of Subject Lead (and contact
details) |
|
|
Title of Education Required |
|
|
Priority |
Descriptor |
Please Tick |
Specific Deadline |
Update Frequency e.g. every 3 years |
|
RED |
Immediate (Education to
produce education flyer within
5 working days of request. All
staff to
have confirmed receipt of education through regions/
departments with
15 days) of distribution
of request. |
|
|
|
|
AMBER |
Within Year (within financial
year) roll
out of content within
education currently being delivered. |
|
|
|
|
GREEN |
Non urgent (future financial year) roll out of
content. |
|
|
|
|
Is the Education... |
|
|
Part amendment to existing content |
|
|
Complete re-write
of existing
content |
|
|
New Subject |
|
|
Part removal
of existing content |
|
|
Complete removal
of subject |
|
|
Origin of
Education
Request |
|
|
National Compliance Standards
e.g. CQC |
|
|
Identified through PDR or
Clinical Supervision |
|
|
Subjects identified through
Clinical Workforce Development Group (including SIs) |
|
|
Subjects identified through
National or Local changes in practice |
|
|
Organisational Business Plan |
|
|
Indicate the staff groups who this
education relates to by placing a tick in the relevant boxes |
|||
|
All Staff |
|
||
|
If the education does not
apply to all staff, please indicate the specific staff group |
|||
|
111 Staff |
|
Supervisors |
|
|
UTC/ UCC Staff |
|
Managers |
|
|
Home Visiting Staff |
|
Senior Managers |
|
|
Clinical Admin Staff |
|
Other – please specify |
|
|
Non-Clinical Admin Staff |
|
|
|
|
Indicate the delivery method(s) of this education |
|||
|
Face to Face |
|
Regional/ Departmental Poster |
|
|
E-Learning |
|
Organisational Bulletin |
|
|
Workbook |
|
Departmental Bulletin |
|
|
Cascade System via PEds |
|
Other – please specify |
|
|
SOP Insert |
|
|
|
|
NB- if the education request is RED please
state how you
are going to
update
all relevant staff within the set time scale:
(e.g. have you budgeted to cover staff attending education). |
|||
|
NB- If the education request is AMBER
please state
how you are going to update the
staff who have already completed their education programme for the current year: |
|||
|
Details of
Education |
||
|
Indicate who will be responsible for setting and writing the content |
Subject lead (as identified
above) |
|
|
Line / Department managers |
|
|
|
External agencies |
|
|
|
Education and Training Team |
|
|
|
Indicate who will be responsible for delivering this education |
Subject lead (as identified
above) |
|
|
Line / Department managers |
|
|
|
External agencies |
|
|
|
Education and Training Team |
|
|
|
If the Education is to be
delivered face to face, please indicate the
approximate length
of session (in hours) |
||
|
If the Education is to be
delivered face to face, or cascade please indicate if there is a train the trainer requirement |
||
|
If the Education is to be
delivered face to face, or cascade, or via e-learning please indicate if
there is a requirement for specific facilities and/or equipment |
||
|
The identified subject lead
is
responsible for evaluating this education. Please indicate
how the evaluation is to be conducted |
||
|
Learning
outcomes (identify the main points that the education needs to
cover and also
attach the
evidence to support your request) |
||
|
|
||
|
Please indicate here any other specific details regarding this education (e.g.
different levels of this)
education required, relevant to
different staff groups) |
||
Appendix 2
|
Lesson
Plan |
||||
|
Date |
Time
TBC |
Duration Incl.
Breaks |
Building
TBC |
Room
TBC |
|
Programme |
|
|||
|
Module |
|
|||
|
Subject |
|
|||
|
Topic |
|
|||
|
No.
Students |
|
|||
|
Tutor:
Student Ratio |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
Lesson
Aims |
||||
|
Specific
Learning Outcomes |
||||
|
Previous
Knowledge Assumed |
||||
|
Materials
and Equipment Required Register |
||||
|
Assessment
Method |
||||
|
Differentiation
The
approach to this lesson should be one of support for all levels of student. Students
should be invited to discuss in private tutorials any concerns they have over
diversity and differentiation. Common
concerns will likely be Dyslexia, Dyspraxia, and Dyscalculia for which
further Hidden Disability support is available. Hidden Curriculum issues
(that is previous discrimination on the grounds of impairment, age, sex,
race, social class etc.) for mature students might also affect confidence in
the classroom setting. Safeguarding |
||||
|
Timing |
Sub
objective |
Teacher
Activity |
Student
Activity |
Resources/
Notes/ Differentiation |
|
|
|
|
|
The PPT is produced in a font and background identified as
supportive of Hidden Disabilities including Dyslexia and Irlen’s syndrome. |
|
min |
TSSBAT: |
|
In Plenary |
|
|
Coffee Break 30min |
|
|
|
|
|
eLearning Lesson Plan |
||||
|
Date |
Time TBC |
Duration Incl. Breaks |
Building TBC |
Room TBC |
|
Programme |
|
|||
|
Module |
|
|||
|
Subject |
|
|||
|
Topic |
|
|||
|
No. Students |
Variable |
|||
|
Offline Tutor Support |
Yes or No |
|||
|
Contact Email if Yes: |
||||
|
|
||||
|
Lesson Aims |
||||
|
Specific Learning Outcomes As per sub objectives |
||||
|
Previous Knowledge Assumed |
||||
|
Materials and Equipment Required Register via automatic Moodle record |
||||
|
Assessment Method |
||||
|
Differentiation The approach to this lesson should be one of support for all
levels of student. Students should be invited to discuss in private tutorials any
concerns they have over diversity and differentiation. Common concerns will likely be Dyslexia, Dyspraxia, and Dyscalculia
for which further Hidden Disability support is available. Hidden Curriculum
issues (that is previous discrimination on the grounds of impairment, age,
sex, race, social class etc.) for mature students might also affect
confidence in the classroom setting. Safeguarding |
||||
|
Estimated Comprehension Timing |
Sub objective |
Teacher Activity |
Student Activity |
Resources/ Notes/ Differentiation |
|
The time of each section is down to the student, but this
section is an estimation of the time for comprehension of the content by a
student with the minimum level of previous knowledge. |
|
Although a teacher is not present during teaching sufficient
content must be included in the materials to replace the presence of a
teacher. This section should include Links to resources that support the narrative and notes on key
themes for inclusion in the topic: |
|
The PPT is produced in a font and background identified as
supportive of Hidden Disabilities including Dyslexia and Irlen’s syndrome. |
|
min |
TSSBAT: |
Links to resources: Key Themes: |
Electronically supported self-study |
|
|
min |
Assessment |
|
Completing Online Assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
Completing Feedback |
|
|
|
|
|
Print Certificate |
|
